AI in Schools: Revolution or Risk?

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming education, sparking both excitement and controversy in schools across Australia. While some institutions are actively incorporating AI as a learning tool, others enforce restrictions to prevent misuse. This divergence in approach raises crucial questions about the future of education and the role AI should play in shaping student learning.

The Benefits of Integration

Many Australian schools have recognised the potential of AI to enhance student learning, improve productivity and foster critical thinking. Schools such as St Norbert College and Westminster School have implemented structured AI policies that encourage ethical and responsible use. 

Schools like St Andrew’s Cathedral School have developed nuanced policies that encourage responsible AI use while maintaining academic integrity.

These policies emphasise:

• AI literacy – Teaching students how to critically evaluate AI-generated content.

• Ethical guidelines – Setting clear boundaries for AI use in assignments and research.

• Transparency – Requiring students to acknowledge when and how they use AI tools.

• Supervised AI usage – Allowing AI in certain assessments but ensuring that human judgement remains central to learning.

The Case Against AI in Schools

On the other hand, some schools have taken a hard stance against AI, highlighting several risk such as:

• Plagiarism and dishonesty – Some students may misuse AI to generate assignments without genuine learning, leading to academic misconduct.

• False information and bias – AI-generated content is not always accurate and its responses may reflect biases present in the data it was trained on.

• Privacy and security concerns – Sharing personal or sensitive data with AI tools could pose risks if the information is used for training or falls into the wrong hands.

In response, schools have implemented strict policies, such as requiring AI-generated content to be cited and verifying students’ work history through platforms like OneDrive. 

Another concern raised by education researchers is the potential impact of AI on writing skills. Writing is not just about structuring sentences—it is about thinking, feeling and communicating. Some argue that relying on AI for writing can rob students of the deep cognitive engagement required to develop strong literacy and reasoning skills. Instead of discouraging students from writing altogether, educators could encourage them to struggle through the writing process, as this struggle is often an essential part of learning and personal growth.

There is also a broader philosophical question: what does it mean to create something as a human? Some argue that receiving a handwritten letter conveys thoughtfulness and personal investment in a way that AI-generated content never could. Others counter that intention matters more than the medium—if an AI-assisted letter still makes someone feel valued, is it any less meaningful? These debates highlight the need for an ongoing conversation about how AI reshapes creativity, communication and learning.

Striking a Balance

Most schools have adopted a tiered approach to AI use, recognising that different situations call for different levels of integration. Typically, AI is not allowed in high-stakes assessments, such as exams or supervised coursework, where independent critical thinking is paramount. In other cases, some AI use is encouraged, particularly for tasks like spelling and grammar checks, summarisation, or brainstorming. Finally, there are instances where AI is fully permitted, especially in research, creative projects, or assignments that focus on evaluating AI’s role in modern learning. By tailoring AI policies to different contexts, schools aim to harness its benefits while maintaining academic integrity and intellectual development.

Experts in education and technology suggest that young people should be actively involved in shaping AI policies. As students are the primary users of these technologies, incorporating their perspectives through participatory design ensures that rules are fair, practical and beneficial. When policies are imposed without considering students’ real experiences, there is a risk of them being ignored or circumvented.

Conclusion

The debate over AI in schools reflects broader conversations about technology, ethics and education. Whether embraced or banned, one thing is clear: AI will continue to reshape learning in profound ways. The challenge lies in finding the right balance—leveraging AI’s benefits while mitigating its risks—to create a future-ready education system that prioritises both innovation and integrity.

And finally, let’s acknowledge the irony here…this article was, in fact, written with the assistance of AI! But before you cry foul, rest assured that plenty of human intention, judgement and creativity went into shaping it. After all, AI may be a helpful tool, but it still needs a guiding hand to make something truly meaningful!

---

Further Resources

For those interested in exploring this topic further, here are some helpful resources:

• Australian Department of Education AI Guidelines – Official recommendations on AI use in schools. Read more here.

• Search Engine Podcast Episode – A deep dive into how students are using AI and the evolving debate in education. Listen to the episode here.

• Harvard’s Center for Digital Thriving – Research and insights on how technology impacts student well-being and learning. Visit here.

• John Warner’s Book: More Than Words – A critical look at writing in the AI era and its impact on learning. Available here.